ISAAC SIMMONS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that there was no error in the revocation of probation or the imposition of sentence.
The defendant was initially sentenced, then placed on probation after a previous sentence was vacated. This probation was later revoked.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sentencing Credit cases and more on FLexlaw
This is an appeal from an order revoking an order placing the defendant on probation in a case wherein he was charged with robbery and a sentence of ten (10) years with directions that the defendant be allowed credit for the time served under a previous sentence imposed December 23, 1963, which previous sentence was vacated when the defendant was, on December 18, 1964, placed on probation for fifteen years, now revoked. We affirm.
The first sentence appears to have been set aside pursuant to a petition for habeas corpus and to vacate the sentence, after the defendant when represented by counsel withdrew his plea of not guilty and entered a plea of guilty, which petition stated that he was conditionally promised probation instead of a sentence. The parts of the record based on the said habeas corpus to vacate sentence are not considered material to this review.
The defendant was represented by counsel at the revocation hearing, but counsel did not enter this appeal. The defendant *70appealed pro se and counsel here was subsequently appointed to assist.
Thus finding no error in the revocation of probation or sentence, the judgment appealed is affirmed.
Affirmed.
REED, J., concurs.
CROSS, J., concurs in conclusion.