PRIVETT

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Keefer, 799 F.2d 1115 (6th Cir. 1986)
  …. 2d 408, 412 (2d Cir.1979); United States v. Levine, 457 F. 2d 1186 (10th Cir.1972), as well as the legislative history of 18 U.S.C. § 2.6 See also Annot., 52 A.L.R.Fed. 769 (1981). In United States v. Murph, 707 F. 2d 895 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 844, 104 S.Ct. 145, 78 L.Ed.2d 136 (1983), this court upheld the appellant’s conviction under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2(b) and 287, for willfully causing a “tax return discounter” to submit a fraudulent tax return to the Internal Revenue Service. There was no indi…
• United States v. Stone, 954 F.2d 1187 (6th Cir. 1992)
  …ent may charge several acts in the conjunctive yet support a conviction of only one of the acts charged. See, e.g., United States v. Hathaway, 798 F. 2d 902, 913 (6th Cir.1986); United States v. Murph, 707 F. 2d 895, 896-97 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 844, 104 S.Ct. 145, 78 L.Ed.2d 136 (1983). This rule has received the imprimatur of the Supreme Court as well. See United States v. Miller, 471 U.S. 130, 136, 105 S.Ct. 1811, 1815, 85 L.Ed.2d 99 (1985). We therefore find Stone’s objection that the gover…
• United States v. Albertini, 783 F.2d 1484 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …ss by itself. See Cafeteria Workers, 367 U.S. at 891-92, 81 S.Ct. at 1746-47. The commander has “authority to maintain discipline and order on the base and to ensure its smooth operation.” Tokar v. Heame, 699 F. 2d 753, 756 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 844, 104 S.Ct. 146, 78 L.Ed.2d 137 (1983). Even during an open house, an important security interest remains in controlling the access of persons thought to present special problems or dangers. Albertini, 105 S.Ct. at 2907. Weighing these interests as t…