COPENHAVER

v.

HARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC.

Citator

Cited By

• Dimidowich v. Bell & Howell, 803 F.2d 1473 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …strella, 682 F. 2d at 817 (quoting West v. AT & T Co., 311 U.S. 223, 236-37, 61 S.Ct. 179, 183, 85 L.Ed. 139 (1940)); accord Fleury v. Harper & Row, Publishers, 698 F. 2d 1022, 1026 (9th Cir.) (“in the absence of convincing evidence”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846, 104 S.Ct. 149, 78 L.Ed.2d 139 (1983). In this case, convincing evidence exists which compels this court to disregard the Guild Wineries case. The court in Guild Wineries decided that a distributor’s termination in the context of a dual distribut…
• Acri v. Berg, 781 F.2d 1393 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …S.Ct. 1599, 80 L.Ed.2d 130 (1984). When, as in this case, the eviden-tiary facts determining the date of accrual are not in dispute, accrual is also a question of law. Fleury v. Harper & Row Publishers, 698 F. 2d 1022, 1029 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846, 104 S.Ct. 149, 78 L.Ed.2d 139 (1983). Prior to the Supreme Court’s decision in DelCostello v. Teamsters, 462 U.S. 151, 103 S.Ct. 2281, 76 L.Ed.2d 476 (1983), we applied the statute of limitations applicable to statutory causes of action under [*13…
• Levinson v. Basic Inc., 786 F.2d 741 (6th Cir. 1986)
  …de when the defendants traded in the stock, and, because the insider trading was secret, there was no way in which their wrongful acts could have affected market price. See also Laventhall v. General Dynamics, 704 F. 2d 407 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846, 104 S.Ct. 150, 78 L.Ed.2d 140 (1983) (insider trading, no public statement); Vervaecke v. Chiles, Heider & Co., 578 F. 2d 713 (8th Cir.1978) (misrepresentations surrounding the initial offering of corporate bonds, a situation in which price is not…