CINCINNATI CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL.

v.

RONCKER, ON BEHALF OF RONCKER

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• Taylor v. James G. Ledbetter, PH.D., 818 F.2d 791 (11th Cir. 1987)
  …erent to her rights and, therefore, they are liable under the reasoning employed in Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 97 S.Ct. 285, 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976), and in Doe v. New York City Dept. of Social Services, 649 F. 2d 134 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 864, 104 S.Ct. 195, 78 L.Ed.2d 171 (1983). The second claim is that the Georgia statutory foster care scheme creates a legitimate claim of entitlement enforceable in federal court under the holding in Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 92 S.Ct. 270…

  ← 1 / 5 →
• Hohri v. United States, 782 F.2d 227 (D.C. Cir. 1986)
  …ling requirements we need not reach the thorny question of when appellants’ claims "arose.” . Compare Keene Corp. v. United States, 700 F. 2d 836, 841 (2d Cir.1983) (refusing to waive the FTCA filing requirement on equitable grounds), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 864, 104 S.Ct. 195, 78 L.Ed.2d 171 (1984); Lunsford v. United States, 570 F. 2d 221, 224 (8th Cir.1977) (same); [*246] Blain v. United States, 552 F. 2d 289, 291 (9th Cir.1977) (same); Best Bearings Co. v. United States, 463 F. 2d 1177, 1179 (7th Cir.19…
• Sammons v. Maury Taylor, 967 F.2d 1533 (11th Cir. 1992)
  …, prior to Judge Hall’s final Order in that case denying relief to Sammons. n. A district court’s grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo by an appellate court. Morrison v. Washington County, Ala., 700 F. 2d 678, 682 (11th Cir.), cert, denied, 464 U.S. 864, 104 S.Ct. 195, 78 L.Ed.2d 171 (1983). When summary judgment is based upon conclusions of law, “those conclusions will be ‘subject to the same standard of appellate review as any question of law raised upon appeal,’ a plenary review of correctness…