VEENKANT
v.
BLAKE ET AL.; AND VEENKANT V. CORSIGLIA ET AL.
VEENKANT
BLAKE ET AL.; AND VEENKANT V. CORSIGLIA ET AL.
464 U.S. 874
Supreme Court of the United States (1983)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Robert (Bobby) Smith v. Bounds, 813 F.2d 1299 (4th Cir. 1987)…efendants. The contempt power of a court does not limit its discretion to fashion equitable remedies. Berger v. Heckler, 771 F. 2d 1556, 1569 (2 Cir.1985); Alexander v. Hill, 707 F. 2d 780, 783 (4 Cir.1983), cert. denied sub nom, Syria v. Alexander, 464 U.S. 874, 104 S.Ct. 206, 78 L.Ed.2d 183 (1983); Smith v. Miller, 665 F. 2d 172, 175 (7 Cir.1981). “The court is invested with broad equitable powers and simply should not be compelled to operate in a punishment or nothing atmosphere.” Alexander v. Hill, supr…