FUNDACION EDUCATIVA ANA G. MENDEZ ET AL.

v.

SUAREZ ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Heckler v. Ringer, 466 U.S. 602 (U.S. 1984)
  …atute of limitations and a venue requirement. “As such, they are waivable by the parties, and not having been timely raised below, see Fed. Rules Civ. Proc. 8(c), 12(h)(1), need not be considered here.” 422 U. S., at 764. See also Heckler v. Lopez, 464 U. S. 879, 883 (1983) (Stevens, J., dissenting in part) (on motion to vacate stay); Schweiker v. Wilson, 450 U. S. 221, 228, n. 8 (1981); Califano v. Sanders, 430 U. S. 99, 108 (1977). Thus, the majority’s characterization of the nonwaivable requirement as “…
• Ayala-Chavez v. U.S. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 945 F.2d 288 (9th Cir. 1991)
  …he enactment of the ADAA, or, in the alternative, that we should grant a discretionary stay under the standards established in Lopez v. Heckler, 713 F. 2d 1432 (9th Cir.), rev’d in part on other grounds, 463 U.S. 1328, 104 S.Ct. 10, 77 L.Ed.2d 1431, 464 U.S. 879, 104 S.Ct. 221, 78 L.Ed.2d 217 (1983).4 We granted a stay pending further order of this court. We now hold that petitioner is entitled to an automatic stay pending final disposition of his petition for review. ANALYSIS Petitioner was convicted of…
• Fargo Women's Health Org. v. Schafer, 507 U.S. 1013 (U.S. 1993)
  …so Heckler v. Redbud Hospital Dist., 473 U. S. 1308, 1312 (1985) (Rehnquist, J., in chambers) (“[A] stay application to a Circuit Justice on a matter before a court of appeals is rarely granted” (internal quotation marks omitted)); Heckler v. Lopez, 464 U. S. 879, 884 (1983) (Stevens, J., joined by Blackmun, J., dissenting in part) (“[I]n such a case the granting of a stay by a Circuit Justice should be extremely rare and great deference should be shown to the judgment of the Court of Appeals”). Consistent…