IN RE DISBARMENT OF CHAGRA

Citator

Cited By

• Pension Benefit Guar. Corp. v. R. A. Gray & Co., 467 U.S. 717 (U.S. 1984)
  …12, and because the equities in this action generally favored Gray over the Pension Plan, id., at 1512-1514 Both the Pension Plan and the PBGC invoked the appellate jurisdiction of this Court under 28 U. S. C. §1252. We noted probable jurisdiction, 464 U. S. 912 (1983),7 and now reverse. II The starting point for analysis is our decision in Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co., 428 U. S. 1 (1976). In Turner Elkhom, we considered a constitutional challenge to the retroactive effects of the Federal Coal Mine…
• Mich. Canners & Freezers Ass'n, Inc. v. Agric. Mktg. & Bargaining Bd., 467 U.S. 461 (U.S. 1984)
  …argaining authority for the sale of agricultural products, are pre-empted by the federal Act. The Supreme Court of Michigan held that the Michigan Act is not pre-empted. 416 [*464] Mich. 706, 332 N. W. 2d 134 (1982). We noted probable jurisdiction, 464 U. S. 912 (1983), and now reverse. h — 1 <C The federal Agricultural Fair Practices Act (AFPA), 82 Stat. 93, 7 U. S. C. §2301 et seq., protects the right of farmers and other producers1 of agricultural commodities to join cooperative associations through…