MARTIN

v.

MITCHELL, WARDEN, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (34 total)

• Heckler v. DAY, 467 U.S. 104 (U.S. 1984)
  …practices in a defined jurisdiction. If new factual developments alter the equitable balance, a court can modify relief. See Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 60(b)(5); New York Assn. for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Carey, 706 F. 2d 956, 967 (CA2), cert. denied, 464 U. S. 915 (1983). Congress’ discussion and inaction might be relevant if, in rejecting a statutory remedy, Congress also rejected the existence of the problem. If any theme emerges from the post-enactment legislative history, however, it is that delay is inc…
• Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk Cnty. Jail, 502 U.S. 367 (U.S. 1992)
  …ree. Id., at 119. Read out of context, this language suggests a “hardening” of the traditional flexible standard for modification of consent decrees. New York State Assn. for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Carey, 706 F. 2d 956, 968 (CA2), cert. denied, 464 U. S. 915 (1983). But that conclusion does not follow when the standard is read in context. See United States v. United Shoe Machinery Corp., 391 U. S. 244, 248 (1968). The Swift opinion pointedly distinguished the facts of that case from one in which genuine…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Int'l Paper Co. v. Ouellette, 479 U.S. 481 (U.S. 1987)
  …lish permit system for waters “within its jurisdiction”) (emphasis added), Lake Erie Alliance for Protection of Coastal Corridor v. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, 526 F. Supp. 1063, 1074-1075 (WD Pa. 1981), aff’d, 707 F. 2d 1392 (CA3), cert. denied, 464 U. S. 915 (1983); State v. Champion International Corp., 709 S. W. 2d 569 (Tenn. 1986), cert. pending, No. 86-57. Thus the Act makes it clear that affected States occupy a subordinate position to source States in the federal regulatory program. H — 4 hH HH…