EDDIE BYRD, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1968-10-01
No. 68-378
Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.
214 So. 2d 346 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1968)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The court affirmed a conviction after the public defender moved to withdraw, finding the appeal to be wholly frivolous after the appellant failed to file a brief despite extensions.


Holding

Yes, the appeal is wholly frivolous, counsel is permitted to withdraw, and the conviction is affirmed.


Key Quotes

“we conclude and determine that the appeal filed herein is wholly frivolous.”

Establishes the court's finding regarding the nature of the appeal.

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The public defender moved to withdraw as counsel for an indigent defendant-appellant, arguing the appeal was frivolous. The court allowed the appellan…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. State of California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, deferred ruling on a motion of public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent de-fendent-appellant, and furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief. After the appellant was allowed thirty days within which to file or raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, the appellant responded thereon and requested an extension of time in order to file his personal brief and points on appeal. The court granted this request of the appellant, and extended the time for appellant to respond up to and including August 18, 1968. The appellant failed to file any further response. On consideration and full examination of the proceedings, we conclude and determine that the appeal filed herein is wholly frivolous.

Whereupon the public defender’s motion to withdraw is granted and the final judgment of conviction and sentence hereby appealed be and the same is hereby

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw