MOON ET AL.

v.

HYOSUNG AMERICA, INC.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Mendoza-Lopez, 481 U.S. 828 (U.S. 1987)
  …nta, 763 F. 2d 1089, 1090 (CA9 1985), and United States v. Bowles, 331 F. 2d 742, 749-750 (CA3 1964) (collateral attack on legality of deportation permitted in § 1326 proceeding), with United States v. Petrella, 707 F. 2d 64, 66 (CA2), cert. denied, 464 U. S. 921 (1983), United States v. Gonzalez-Parra, 438 F. 2d 694, 697 (CA5), cert. denied, 402 U. S. 1010 (1971), and Arriaga-Ramirez v. United States, 325 F. 2d 857, 859 (CA10 1963) (collateral attacks barred in prosecutions under § 1326); see also United St…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Cerda-Pena, 799 F.2d 1374 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …ed with violating 8 U.S.C. section 1326 to collaterally attack the underlying deportation. United States v. Nicholas-Armenta, 763 F. 2d 1089, 1090 (9th Cir.1985). A number of other circuits do not allow such an attack. See Petrella v. United States, 464 U.S. 921, 104 S.Ct. 289, 78 L.Ed.2d 265 (1983) (Justice White dissenting from the denial of certiorari). . Section 242.16(a) requires immigration judges to advise an alien, at his or her deportation hearing, of the alien’s right to obtain representation. 8…
• United States v. Mendoza-Lopez, 781 F.2d 111 (8th Cir. 1985)
  …ortation or of the arrest indicates that the statute seeks to punish the unauthorized reentry of an alien previously deported, regardless of whether the deportation was ‘lawful.’ ” United States v. Petrella, 707 F. 2d 64, 66 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 921, 104 S.Ct. 289, 78 L.Ed.2d 265 (1983). Cf. Lewis, 455 U.S. at 60, 100 S.Ct. at 918 (“No modifier is present, and nothing suggests any restriction on the scope of the term [deported].”) Despite the plain language of the statute, the court today ad…