ROLLINS ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (25 total)

• State v. Margretta Daniels, 576 So. 2d 819 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)
  …. United States v. Roman, 849 F. 2d 920, 922 (5th Cir.1988). However, an unconstitutional seizure or arrest which prompts a disclaimer of property vitiates the disclaimer. United States v. Tolbert, 692 F. 2d 1041, 1045 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 933, 104 S.Ct. 337, 78 L.Ed.2d 306 (1983). The term “abandonment” as applied to illegal seizures does not refer to the traditional meaning of that term in the context of property law. Id. at 1044. Within the meaning of illegal seizures, the concept…
• California v. Carney, 471 U.S. 386 (U.S. 1985)
  …e read the opinion as resting on federal law. With few exceptions, the courts have not hesitated to apply the vehicle exception to vehicles other than automobiles. See, e. g., United States v. Rollins, 699 F. 2d 530 (CA11) (airplane), cert. denied, 464 U. S. 933 (1983). We need not pass on the application of the vehicle exception to a motor home that is situated in a way or place that objectively indicates that it is being used as a residence. Among the factors that might be relevant in determining whether…
• Lowenfield v. Phelps, 484 U.S. 231 (U.S. 1988)
  …s per se reversal approach must be followed when reviewing state proceedings on habeas corpus. E. g., Williams v. Parke, 741 F. 2d 847, 851 (CA6 1984), cert. denied, 470 U. S. 1029 (1985); Locks v. Sumner, 703 F. 2d 403, 405-407 (CA9), cert. denied, 464 U. S. 933 (1983). The mistrial motions referred to by the dissent, post, at 254, n. 3, were unrelated to the actions of the trial court — the polls and the supplemental [*241] instruction — that now form the core of petitioner’s argument and the dissent’s at…