INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL UNION NO. 323, AFL-CIO
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

U.S. | 1983-10-31
No. 83-63
with whom Justice Brennan and Justice Blackmun join,
464 U.S. 950 Supreme Court of the United States (1983) Caution
Cited by 5 cases
Topics
Circuit Split Unfair Labor Practice

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Circuit Split cases and more on FLexlaw

Dissent
Justice White,

Justice White,

with whom Justice Brennan and Justice Blackmun join,

dissenting.

After determining that one of its members was working in a supervisory capacity for a nonunion employer, Local No. 323 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) charged the employee with violating the IBEW constitution. That document provides that a member may be penalized for “[wjorking in the interest of any organization or cause which is detrimental to, or opposed to, the I. B. E. W.” The employee was fined and ultimately expelled from the union.

The National Labor Relations Board charged the Local with an unfair labor practice for violating § 8(b)(1)(B) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 452, as amended, 29 U.

S. C. § 158(b)(1)(B), which provides in pertinent part that “[i]t shall be an unfair labor practice for a labor organization or its agents — (1) to restrain or coerce . . . (B) an employer in the selection of his representatives for the purposes of collective bargaining or the adjustment of grievances.” After a hearing, the Administrative Law Judge found that the discipline was imposed for “working for a nonunion contractor,” which in his view constituted unlawful coercion. On review, the Board adopted the Administrative Law Judge’s findings and conclusions. It issued a cease-and-desist order and ordered various affirmative relief. 255 N.

L. R. B. 1395 (1981). The Board then successfully petitioned the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for enforcement of its order.

The court noted that in NLRB v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 73 (Chewelah Contractors, Inc.), 621 F. 2d 1035 (1980), the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit had held that a union does not violate § 8(b)(1)(B) by disciplining a member-supervisor for his employment with a nonunion company if the union neither represents the company’s employees nor displays a representational interest in them. The Eleventh Circuit declined to adopt the Ninth Circuit’s interpretation of the statute, stating that it found the Chewelah limitation inconsistent with the statute’s central aim. 703 F. 2d 501, 507 (1983).

It held that regardless of whether the union displays a representational interest in the company’s employees, an attempt to force a member supervisor to cease working for a nonunion company infringes the employer’s right to select that person as its representative.

The conflict between the Ninth Circuit and the Eleventh Circuit is clear. Identical action by a union will constitute an unfair labor practice in the Eleventh Circuit but not in the Ninth. Implementation of the national labor policy is hampered by such conflicting rules. Accordingly, I would grant the petition to settle the conflict.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Charles v. Daley, 799 F.2d 343 (7th Cir. 1986)
    …ates v. Indrelunas, 411 U.S. 216, 93 S.Ct. 1562, 36 L.Ed.2d 202 (1973); Stelpflug v. Federal Land Bank, 790 F. 2d [*347] 47 (7th Cir.1986); Exchange National Bank, 763 F. 2d at 290; Parisie v. Greer, 705 F. 2d 882 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 950, 104 S.Ct. 366, 78 L.Ed.2d 326 (1983). A minute order suffices when the judge denies a request to alter the judgment, for then the original judgment remains in effect. Here, however, the original judgment has been amended twice, and until the effe…
  • Ctr. FOR Nuclear Responsibility, Inc. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n, 781 F.2d 935 (D.C. Cir. 1986)
    …J., dissenting). Indeed, as in the present case, a decision on timeliness often necessitates a decision on what type of motion is involved. Parisie v. Greer, 685 F. 2d 1016 (7th Cir.1982), vacated, 705 F. 2d 882 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 950, 104 S.Ct. 366, 78 L.Ed.2d 326, and 464 U.S. 918, 104 S.Ct. 284, 78 L.Ed.2d 261 (1983), and Pierre v. Jordan, 333 F. 2d 951 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 974, 85 S.Ct. 664, 13 L.Ed.2d 565 (1964), are not to the contrary. In Parisie the appella…
  • Domegan v. Ponte, 972 F.2d 401 (1st Cir. 1992)
    …ent" issue sua sponte)-, see also Parisie v. Greer, 705 F. 2d 882, 890-91 (7th Cir.) (Eschbach, J.) (discussing duty of court to raise "separate document” issue sua sponte), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 918, 104 S.Ct. 284, 78 L.Ed.2d 261 and cert. denied, 464 U.S. 950, 104 S.Ct. 366, 78 L.Ed.2d 326 (1983). . Section 1988 provides, in part: “In any action or proceeding to enforce a provision of section[ ] ... 1983 ..., the court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party ... a reasonable attorney’s fee as…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw