TRANSAMERICA COMPUTER CO., INC.

v.

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP.

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Cargill, Inc. v. Monfort of Colo., Inc., 479 U.S. 104 (U.S. 1986)
  …ly legal), cert. denied, 469 U. S. 1036 (1984), with Transamerica Computer Co. v. International Business Machines Corp., 698 F. 2d 1377 (CA9) (pricing above average total costs may be deemed predatory upon showing of predatory intent), cert. denied, 464 U. S. 955 (1983). Although neither the District Court nor the Court of Appeals explicitly defined the term predatory pricing, their use of the term is consistent with a definition of pricing below cost. Such a definition is sufficient for purposes of this de…
• Oahu GAS Serv., Inc. v. Pac. Res. Inc., 838 F.2d 360 (9th Cir. 1988)
  …e done in [*366] previous cases in which the other requirements for maintaining a Section 2 action were in doubt. See, e.g., Transamerica Computer Co., Inc. v. International Business Machines Corp., 698 F. 2d 1377, 1382 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 955, 104 S.Ct. 370, 78 L.Ed.2d 329 (1983); California Computer Products, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corp., 613 F. 2d 727, 739 (9th Cir.1979). B. Market Power The jury found that Gaseo possessed monopoly power in the Hawaiian propane marke…
• Syufy Enters. v. Am. Multicinema, Inc., 793 F.2d 990 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …monopoly power in the relevant market; (2) willful acquisition or maintenance of that power; and (3) causal ‘antitrust’ injury.” Transamerica Computer Co., Inc. v. International Business Machines Corp., 698 F. 2d 1377, 1382 (9th Cir.), cert denied, 464 U.S. 955, 104 S.Ct. 370, 78 L.Ed.2d 329 (1983); see also California Computer Products, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corp., 613 F. 2d 727, 735 (9th Cir.1979). Thus, we must decide whether AMC presented substantial evidence with respect to each of t…

  ← 1 / 2 →