UNITED STATES

v.

MCMANIGAL

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Erwin, 803 F.2d 1505 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …troopers with a reasonable suspicion that Erwin was carrying narcotics. Other circuits have found reasonable suspicion on similar or less incriminating facts. See, e.g., United States v. Moya, 704 F. 2d 337, 343 (7th Cir.) vacated on other grounds, 464 U.S. 979, 104 S.Ct. 418, 78 L.Ed.2d 355 (1983); United States v. Ramirez-Cifuentes, 682 F. 2d 337, 342 (2d Cir.1982); United States v. Sanford, 658 F. 2d 342, 345 (5th Cir. Unit B Oct. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 991, 102 S.Ct. 1618, 71 L.Ed.2d 852 (1982).…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Amend, 791 F.2d 1120 (4th Cir. 1986)
  …that the assets subject to forfeiture were still in existence at the time of her conviction. She relies upon United States v. Alexander, 741 F. 2d 962 (7th Cir.1984) and United States v. McManigal, 708 F. 2d 276 (7th Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 464 U.S. 979, 104 S.Ct. 419, 78 L.Ed.2d 355 aff'd on remand, 723 F. 2d 580 (7th Cir.1983). In United States v. Ginsburg, 773 F. 2d 798, 802 (7th Cir.1985) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 1186, 89 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986), the Seventh Circuit, however, ove…
• CNA Fin. Corp. v. Donovan, 830 F.2d 1132 (D.C. Cir. 1987)
  …Exemption 3 is written in the disjunctive, so that a statute need satisfy only one of the three standards set out therein. See Washington Post Co. v. Department of State, 222 U.S.App.D.C. 248, 301-302, 685 F. 2d 698, 701-702 (1982), vacated as moot, 464 U.S. 979, 104 S.Ct. 418, 78 L.Ed.2d 355 (1983); Iron & Sears v. Dann, supra note 38, 196 U.S.App.D.C. at 313, 606 F. 2d at 1220; American Jewish Congress v. Kreps, supra note 36, 187 U.S.App.D.C. at 417, 574 F. 2d at 628. . American Jewish Congress v. Kreps…