IN RE DISBARMENT OF LOWENTHAL
IN RE DISBARMENT OF LOWENTHAL
464 U.S. 988
Supreme Court of the United States (1983)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hutchinson v. Stephen Groskin, M.D., 927 F.2d 722 (2d Cir. 1991)…ch evidence. See Hartke v. McKelway, 526 F.Supp. 97, 101 (D.D.C.1981) (trial court must weigh the qualifications of the witness and determine whether she is qualified to express an opinion on the subject), aff'd, 707 F. 2d 1544 (D.C.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 988, 104 S.Ct. 425, 78 L.Ed.2d 360 (1983); cf., Fed.R.Evid. 702 (providing that expert witness must be qualified by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education). Despite these infirmities, the three letters were treated as evidence on the issu…