ARRUDA
v.
FAIR, COMMISSIONER, MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, ET AL.
ARRUDA
FAIR, COMMISSIONER, MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, ET AL.
464 U.S. 999
Supreme Court of the United States (1983)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Goff v. Crispus NIX, 803 F.2d 358 (8th Cir. 1986)…legal materials.”); Dufrin v. Spreen, 712 F. 2d 1084 (6th Cir.1983) (pretrial detainee charged with felonious assault); Arruda v. Fair, 710 F. 2d 886 (1st Cir.1983) (convicted prisoner in segregation unit of maximum security facility), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 999, 104 S.Ct. 502, 78 L.Ed.2d 693 (1983). In Arruda, the First Circuit declined to invalidate a prison policy requiring VBC searches for inmates in the security unit of a maximum security prison when they enter or leave their unit. The policy resulte…
-
HAY v. Waldron, 834 F.2d 481 (5th Cir. 1987)…86), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 108 S.Ct. 115, 98 L.Ed.2d 73 (1987) (visual body cavity inspection in maximum security facility upheld as a condition of any movement outside the segregation unit); Arruda v. Fair, 710 F. 2d 886 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 999, 104 S.Ct. 502, 78 L.Ed.2d 693 (1983) (maximum security facility inmates subjected to visual body cavity inspection upon leaving and returning to cells when visiting prison library or infirmary, and for supervised, noncontact visitations). In summa…