DAVIS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• McMILLAN v. Pennsylvania, 477 U.S. 79 (U.S. 1986)
  …tatute, 18 [*93] U. S. C. § 3575, which provides for an enhanced sentence if the court concludes that the defendant is both “dangerous” and a “special offender.” See United States v. Davis, 710 F. 2d 104, 106 (CA3) (collecting cases), cert. denied, 464 U. S. 1001 (1983). IV In light of the foregoing, petitioners’ final claim — that the Act denies them their Sixth Amendment right to a trial by jury — merits little discussion. Petitioners again argue that the jury must determine all ultimate facts concerning…
• Tison v. Arizona, 481 U.S. 137 (U.S. 1987)
  …he joint venture); People v. Davis, 95 Ill. 2d 1, 52, 447 N. E. 2d 353, 378 (defendant present at the scene and had participated in other crimes with Holman, the trigger-man, during which Holman had killed under similar circumstances), cert. denied, 464 U. S. 1001 (1983); Selvage v. State, 680 S. W. 2d 17, 22 (Tex. Cr. App. 1984) (participant in jewelry store robbery during the course of which a security guard was killed; no evidence that defendant himself shot the guard but he did fire a weapon at those who…
• United States v. Hawkins, 811 F.2d 210 (3d Cir. 1987)
  …larly, we have upheld the statute authorizing the trial court to enhance a defendant’s sentence upon the court’s finding that a defendant is dangerous and a special offender. See United States v. Davis, 710 F. 2d 104, 106-07 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1001, 104 S.Ct. 505, 78 L.Ed.2d 695 (1983) (sustaining 18 U.S.C. § 3575(b) which authorizes imposition of up to a twenty-five year special sentence on felons found by the trial court judge, by a preponderance of the evidence, to be dangerous special offe…

  ← 1 / 2 →