MICHIGAN CANNERS & FREEZERS ASSN., INC., ET AL.

v.

AGRICULTURAL MARKETING AND BARGAINING BOARD ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Thigpen v. Roberts, 468 U.S. 27 (U.S. 1984)
• Selective Serv. Sys. v. Minn. Pub. Interest Research Grp., 468 U.S. 841 (U.S. 1984)
  …led self-incrimination. On June 29, we stayed the District Court’s June 16 order pending the timely docketing and final disposition of this appeal. Selective Service System v. Doe, 463 U. S. 1215. We noted probable jurisdiction on December 5, 1983, 464 U. S. 1006, and we reverse. II The District Court held that § 12(f) falls within the category of congressional actions that Art. I, § 9, cl. 3, of the Constitution bars by providing that “[n]o Bill of Attainder . . . shall be passed.” A bill of attainder was…
• Alberico v. The United States, 783 F.2d 1024 (Fed. Cir. 1986)
  …note that the amendment to the regulation does not involve any of the several punishments the Supreme Court has noted as being historically associated with bills of attainder. See Selective Service System v. Minnesota Public Service Research Group, 464 U.S. 1006, 104 S.Ct. 522, 78 L.Ed.2d 707 (1984). In addition, we conclude that the amendment to AR 635-100 was not an ex post facto law. Alberico is complaining about a change in procedure, not a change having retroactive substantive effect. A procedural cha…