NEWMAN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Ochs, 842 F.2d 515 (1st Cir. 1988)
  …plead an acquittal or conviction in bar of future prosecution for the same offense.” United States v. Fusaro, 708 F. 2d 17, 23 (1st Cir.) (citing Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87, 117, 94 S.Ct. 2887, 2907, 41 L.Ed.2d 590 (1974)), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1007, 104 S.Ct. 524, 78 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983). In addition to the intangible rights violation, Count One charges Ochs and Dray with conspiracy to commit mail fraud by lowball-ing the construction cost estimates on the building permit and by double billing…
• United States v. Standridge, 810 F.2d 1034 (11th Cir. 1987)
  …Rel. Authority, 699 F. 2d 1082, 1087 (11th Cir.) ("Congress is deemed to know the executive and judicial gloss given to certain language and thus adopts the existing interpretation unless it affirmatively acts to change the meaning.”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1007, 104 S.Ct. 524, 78 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983). . In cases not involving firearm possession offenses, we have held in the past that the government has the burden of proving the validity of a prior conviction where the record is silent as to whether an indig…
• Hill v. Texaco, Inc., 825 F.2d 333 (11th Cir. 1987)
  …rector, Office of Workers’ Compensation, U.S. Dept. of Labor v. Perini North River Associates, 459 U.S. 297, 103 S.Ct. 634, 74 L.Ed.2d 465 (1983); Florida National Guard v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, 699 F. 2d 1082 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1007, 104 S.Ct. 524, 78 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983). In setting the PMPA limitation period, Congress did not use any language tied explicitly or implicitly to discovery of wrongdoing. It started the limitation period not when the violation was discovered, but sim…