MARKS
v.
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
MARKS
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
464 U.S. 1011
Supreme Court of the United States (1983)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kiran K. Shah v. Gen. Elec. Co., 816 F.2d 264 (6th Cir. 1987)…ations for the vacant position.” Id. at 865. Failure to prove any one of these elements by a preponderance of the evidences mandates a dismissal of the plaintiffs suit. Morvay v. Maghielse Tool & Die Co., 708 F. 2d 229, 233 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1011, 104 S.Ct. 534, 78 L.Ed.2d 715 (1983). Case law subsequent to McDonnell Douglas has emphasized that the prima facie method “was never intended to be rigid, mechanized, or ritualistic. Rather, it is merely a sensible, orderly way to evaluate the evi…
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Seligman & Assocs., Inc., 808 F.2d 1155 (6th Cir. 1986)…different position and failing to seek similar available employment. Finally, Seligman maintains that the ALJ made errors in calculating the backpay due the Younces. In Morvay v. Maghielse Tool and Die Co., 708 F. 2d 229 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1011, 104 S.Ct. 534, 78 L.Ed.2d 715 (1983), our court discussed the requisites of a reinstatement offer that will terminate backpay accrual: The purpose of an offer to reinstate is to “undo the employer’s wrong by restoring the employees to the position…