GONZALEZ

v.

COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE OF CALIFORNIA (CALIFORNIA ET AL., REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST)

Citator

Cited By (22 total)

• Thornburgh v. Am. Coll. of Obstetricians & Gynecologists, 476 U.S. 747 (U.S. 1986)
  …croft, had taken a view of the applicable law which this Court’s decisions in those cases demonstrated to be erroneous. Citing Apple Computer, Inc. v. Franklin Computer Corp., 714 F. 2d 1240, 1242 (CA3 1983), cert. dism’d under this Court’s Rule 53, 464 U. S. 1033 (1984), the Court of Appeals stated that “[t]he customary discretion accorded to a district court’s ruling on a preliminary injunction yields to our plenary scope of review as to the applicable law.” 737 F. 2d 283, 290 (1984). Apple Computer, in tur…
• Rosa v. Resolution Tr. Corp., 938 F.2d 383 (3d Cir. 1991)
  …ISA to make a showing of irreparable harm to obtain this relief, because we find legal error in the granting of the injunction in this respect. See Apple Computer, Inc. v. Franklin Computer Corp., 714 F. 2d 1240, 1242 (3d Cir.1983), cert. dismissed, 464 U.S. 1033, 104 S.Ct. 690, 79 L.Ed.2d 158 (1984). RTC argues that the order prohibiting termination is “overbroad” because both the plan and ERISA give plan sponsors authority to seek plan termination. PBGC agrees with RTC. Plaintiffs argue that RTC failed to…
• Whelan Assocs., Inc. v. Jaslow Dental Lab., Inc., 797 F.2d 1222 (3d Cir. 1986)
  …ram’s source and object codes. Stern Electronics, Inc. v. Kaufman, 669 F. 2d 852, 855 n. 3 (2d Cir.1982) (source code); Apple Computer, Inc. v. Franklin Computer Corp., 714 F. 2d 1240, 1246-47 (3d Cir.1983) (source and objeet code), cert. dismissed, 464 U.S. 1033, 104 S.Ct. 690, 79 L.Ed.2d 158 (1984); Williams Electronics, Inc. v. Artic International, Inc., 685 F. 2d 870 (3d Cir.1982) (object code). In this case, however, the district court did not find any copying of the source or object codes, nor did th…

  ← 1 / 2 →