UNITED STATES
v.
GOUVEIA ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in this case involving federal prisoners William Gouveia, Robert Ramirez, Philip Segura, Robert E. Mills, and Richard Raymond Pierce, and appointed counsel to represent the respondents. The order addresses procedural matters including the appointment of counsel for indigent defendants and requests for divided oral argument before the Court.
© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 913.] Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that Joseph F. Walsh, Esquire, of Los Angeles, Cal., be appointed to serve as counsel for respondent Robert Ramirez in this case. Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that Joel Levine, Esquire, of Los Angeles, Cal., be appointed to serve as counsel for respondent Philip Segura in this case. Motion of respondent William Gouveia for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that Michael J. Treman, Esquire, of Santa Barbara, Cal., be appointed to serve as counsel for respondent William Gouveia in this case. Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that Charles P. Diamond, Esquire, of Los Angeles, Cal, be appointed to serve as counsel for respondents Robert E. Mills and Richard Raymond Pierce in this case. Motion of respondents Robert E. Mills and Richard Raymond Pierce for divided argument granted. Motion of respondents William Gouveia et al. for divided argument denied.