HILL

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (33 total)

• United States v. Garcia, 785 F.2d 214 (8th Cir. 1986)
  …F. 2d at 221; United States v. Nabors, 762 F. 2d 642, 652-53 (8th Cir.1985). To be guilty of conspiracy, one must knowingly contribute to the furtherance of the conspiracy. United States v. Wilford, 710 F. 2d 439, 448 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1039, 104 S.Ct. 701, 79 L.Ed.2d 166 (1984). Knowing contribu tion requires some element of cooperation beyond mere knowledge of the existence of the conspiracy. United States v. Brown, 584 F. 2d 252, 262 (8th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 910, 99 S.C…
• Chester R. Robinson and wife v. The Nat'l Cash Register Co., 808 F.2d 1119 (5th Cir. 1987)
  …te court. Where, however, the removing party can prove that there is “absolutely no possibility” that the non-diverse defendant will be liable to plaintiff in state court, Green v. Amerada Hess Corp., 707 F. 2d 201, 205 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1039, 104 S.Ct. 701, 79 L.Ed.2d 166 (1984), or when there is “no arguably reasonable basis” that state law might impose liability on the non-diverse defendant, Tedder v. FMC Corp., 590 F. 2d 115, 117 (5th Cir.1979), removal is allowed without complete di…
• United States v. Castro, 776 F.2d 1118 (3d Cir. 1985)
  …dequately submitted the entrapment issue to the jury. Castro argues that he was entitled to an instruction concerning his own susceptibility to inducement, however. In accordance with United States v. Hill, 655 F. 2d 512 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied 464 U.S. 1039, 104 S.Ct. 699, 79 L.Ed.2d 165 (1984), the lower court permitted Castro to introduce the expert testimony of a psychologist who examined Castro after his arrest. This testimony indicated that Castro was more susceptible to inducement than the averag…