GRIMM ET AL.

v.

RIZK ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (25 total)

• Nachwalter v. Christie, 805 F.2d 956 (11th Cir. 1986)
  …ERISA plans be “maintained” in writing precludes oral modifications of the Plans; the common law doctrine of estoppel cannot be used to alter this result. Cf. MoKan Teamsters Pension Fund v. Creason, 716 F. 2d 772, 777 (10th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1045, 104 S.Ct. 716, 79 L.Ed.2d 178 (1984) (oral modification of col lective bargaining agreement prohibited by Labor Management Relations Act); San Pedro Fishermen’s Welfare v. Di Bernardo, 664 F. 2d 1344, 1345 (9th Cir.1982) (Labor Management Relations…
• Popham v. City OF Kennesaw, 820 F.2d 1570 (11th Cir. 1987)
  …claims challenging failure to hire and to promote related to equal pay claim); Morgado v. Birmingham-Jefferson County Civil Defense Corps, 706 F. 2d 1184, 1192-93 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied sub nom. Personnel Board of Jefferson County v. Morgado, 464 U.S. 1045, 104 S.Ct. 715, 79 L.Ed.2d 178 (1984) (accord). The claims Popham raised, arising out of the same course of conduct, share a common core of facts and thus are related for purposes of Section 1988. Therefore, had the district court refused to awar…
• Straub v. W. Union Tel. Co., 851 F.2d 1262 (10th Cir. 1988)
  …doctrine of estoppel cannot be used to alter this result.” Nachwalter, 805 F. 2d at 960. In reaching this conclusion, the court relied in part on our decision in Mo-Kan Teamsters Pension Fund v. Creason, 716 F. 2d 772 (10th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1045, 104 S.Ct. 716, 79 L.Ed.2d 178 (1984), where we held that an oral modification of an employee trust provision in a collective bargaining agreement could have no effect under the Labor Management Relations Act. Id. at Til. The court in Nachwalter als…