SMITH
v.
HEERINGA ET AL.

U.S. | 1984-01-09
No. 83-5140
464 U.S. 1045 Supreme Court of the United States (1984) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Mulhall v. Advance Sec., Inc., 19 F.3d 586 (11th Cir. 1994)
    …ndants nor the court relied on the “seniority system” defense to the EPA because that defense requires a formal seniority structure. Morgado v. Birmingham-Jefferson County Civil Defense Corps., 706 F. 2d 1184, 1189-90 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1045, 104 S.Ct. 715, 79 L.Ed.2d 178 (1984). Instead, the district court’s ruling on behalf of defendants rested on “a factor other than sex,” to wit, seniority. See e.g., Blocker v. AT & T Technology Systems, 666 F.Supp. 209, 213-214 (M.D.Fla.1987) (ci…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw