MCKNIGHT

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Gunsby v. State, 574 So. 2d 1085 (Fla. 1991)
  …962 (Fla.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 873, 105 S.Ct. 223, 83 L.Ed.2d 153 (1984); Harris v. State, 438 So. 2d 787 (Fla.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 963, 104 S.Ct. 2181, 80 L.Ed.2d 563 (1984); Foster v. State, 436 So. 2d 56 (Fla.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1052, 104 S.Ct. 734, 79 L.Ed.2d 193 (1984). Further, given the testimony, the error, if any, was clearly harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. We note that this case was tried on the theory of premeditated murder. Finally, we find that Gunsby’s claim that…
• In the Interest of M.D.A., 517 So. 2d 711 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
  …gent, entitled to the appointment of counsel. Whereas, if permanent termination of custody is not threatened, appointment of counsel is to be determined by the court on a case-by-case basis. Davis v. Page, 714 F. 2d 512 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1052, 104 S.Ct. 735, 79 L.Ed.2d 194 (1984). There is a further due process right to be advised of one’s right to counsel of his choice in dependency proceedings, which right should be honored early on in the proceedings. An excellent explication of thi…
• Procup v. Strickland, 792 F.2d 1069 (11th Cir. 1986)
  …f, he simply may not be required to pay a filing [*1080] fee. Boddie v. Connecticut, 401 U.S. 371, 380-82, 91 S.Ct. 780, 787-88, 28 L.Ed.2d 113 (1971);4 Davis v. Page, 618 F. 2d 374, 383 n. 9 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied sub nom. Davis v. Gladstone, 464 U.S. 1052, 104 S.Ct. 735, 79 L.Ed.2d 194 (1984). I see no principled basis for pretermitting Bod-die’s holding merely because the valid claim comes to the court amid a sea of frivolous suits. I object to the fee requirement for a second reason: it has the ef…