CROWE

v.

GEORGIA

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Karo, 468 U.S. 705 (U.S. 1984)
  …privacy of the Taos dwelling, and with respect to respondent Karo because the beeper had been installed without a warrant and had been monitored while its ether-can host was in his house.2 We [*711] granted the Government’s petition for certiorari, 464 U. S. 1068 (1984), which raised the question whether a warrant was required to authorize either the installation of the beeper or its subsequent monitoring. We deal with each contention in turn. II Because the judgment below in favor of Karo rested in major…
• Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth. v. Johnson, 467 U.S. 925 (U.S. 1984)
  …” policy covering all subcontractor employees. The Court of Appeals concluded that, by pre-empting its subcontractors, WMATA acted voluntarily, and was therefore not entitled to §5(a)’s immunity. We granted WMATA’s petition for a writ of certiorari, 464 U. S. 1068 (1984), and we now reverse. I — I I — I Workers compensation statutes, such as the LHWCA, “provide for compensation, in the stead of liability, for a class of employees.” S. Rep. No. 973, 69th Cong., 1st Sess., 16 (1926). These statutes reflect a…
• Jules Link and Solomon Katz v. Mercedes-Benz OF N. Am., Inc., 788 F.2d 918 (3d Cir. 1986)
  …urer. See In re Midwest Milk Monopolization Litigation, 730 F. 2d 528, 529 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 306, 83 L.Ed.2d 240 (1984); In re Coordi [*932] nated Pretrial Proceedings, 691 F. 2d 1335, 1341-42 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1068, 104 S.Ct. 972, 79 L.Ed.2d 211 (1984); In re Beef Industry Antitrust Litigation, 600 F. 2d 1148, 1163 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 905,101 S.Ct. 280, 66 L.Ed.2d 137 (1980). Even if Mercedes and its dealers are deemed to have been co-conspi…