GULLETT

v.

UNITED STATES; AND FOX V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (41 total)

• United States v. MacHado, 804 F.2d 1537 (11th Cir. 1986)
  …erious restrictions on cross-examination as to “eviscerate the defendant’s sixth amendment right to confront adverse witnesses and compel the reversal of a conviction.” United States v. Haimowitz, 706 F. 2d 1549, 1559 (11th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1069, 104 S.Ct. 1069, 79 L.Ed.2d 212 (1984). The sixth amendment requires that a defendant be granted an opportunity to explore criminal charges against a prosecution witness on cross-examination in order to bring the witness’ possible motive or self-int…
• United States v. Debbe Marquardt, 786 F.2d 771 (7th Cir. 1986)
  …creating the impression of more criminal activity on his part than in fact may have been present.” United States v. Carter, 576 F. 2d 1061, 1064 (3rd Cir.1978); see also United States v. Gullett, 713 F. 2d 1203, 1211-12 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1069, 104 S.Ct. 973, 79 L.Ed.2d 211 (1984). The traditional test of multiplicity “determines whether each count ‘requires proof of a fact which the other does not.’ ” United States v. Kennedy, 726 F. 2d 546, 547-48 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 1…
• United States v. Zapata, 871 F.2d 616 (7th Cir. 1989)
  …umstances of the case, and thus such decisions are committed to its discretion, and shall be reversed only upon a finding that the district court abused its discretion. See United States v. Gullett, 713 F. 2d 1203, 1209 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1069, 104 S.Ct. 973, 79 L.Ed.2d 211 (1984). Here, Mr. Zapata submits that Palacio’s refusal to respond on cross-examination not only infringed on his constitutional right to confront his accusers, but also deprived him of the ability to challenge Palaci…