CORDREY

v.

CORDREY

Citator

Cited By

• Jaffee v. Jaffee, 394 So. 2d 443 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …’s motion, we see no reason why he should not be liable for the entire fee that action required. Northup v. Northup, 217 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969); Waller v. Waller, supra; Cordrey v. Cordrey, 206 So. 2d 234 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968), appeal dismissed, 214 So. 2d 617 (Fla.1968); cf., Rosen v. Rosen, 386 So. 2d 1268 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). The requirement that the husband pay $6,250 to the wife’s attorneys shall therefore be increased to the full $12,- [*448] 500 found by the trial court to be a reasonable amount for…
• Frizzell v. Bartley, 372 So. 2d 1371 (Fla. 1979)
  …we must answer is whether section 61.14 allows a modification of an agreement which was not incorporated in the divorce decree. We hold that it does and approve the language in Cordrey v. Cordrey. 206 So. 2d 234, 241 (Fla. 2d DCA), appeal dismissed, 214 So. 2d 617 (Fla.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 527, 89 S.Ct. 866, 21 L.Ed.2d 752 (1969): “The modification statute does not require that the agreement entered into voluntarily by the parties be approved or even reviewed by any judicial tribunal prior to either…
• Graham M. Schorb v. Schorb, 547 So. 2d 985 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)
  …which relate to the same subject matter should typically receive compatible interpretations. Fla. Jai Alai, Inc. v. Lake Howell Water & Reclamation Dist., 274 So. 2d 522 (Fla.1973); Cordrey v. Cordrey, 206 So. 2d 234 (Fla. 2d DCA), appeal dismissed, 214 So. 2d 617 (Fla.1968). Especially when statutes employ exactly the same words or phrases, the legislature is assumed to intend the same meaning. Goldstein v. Acme Concrete Corp., 103 So. 2d 202 (Fla.1958). See also Medical Center Hosp. v. Bowen, 811 F. 2d 1448…

Authorities Cited

• Cordrey v. Cordrey, 206 So. 2d 234 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968)