MORROW ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Debbe Marquardt, 786 F.2d 771 (7th Cir. 1986)
  …creating the impression of more criminal activity on his part than in fact may have been present.” United States v. Carter, 576 F. 2d 1061, 1064 (3rd Cir.1978); see also United States v. Gullett, 713 F. 2d 1203, 1211-12 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1069, 104 S.Ct. 973, 79 L.Ed.2d 211 (1984). The traditional test of multiplicity “determines whether each count ‘requires proof of a fact which the other does not.’ ” United States v. Kennedy, 726 F. 2d 546, 547-48 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 1…
• United States v. Lankford, 955 F.2d 1545 (11th Cir. 1992)
  …tates v. Haimowitz, 706 F. 2d 1549, 1559 (11th Cir.1983) (holding that there was no abuse of discretion where defense counsel had opportunity to expose facts from which jury could draw fair inferences regarding credibility of witness), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1069, 104 S.Ct. 974, 79 L.Ed.2d 212 (1984). The lengthy testimony of LeCroy on both direct and cross-examination about the grant of immunity and his cooperation with the government certainly allowed the defendant to argue bias on the part of LeCroy and,…
• United States v. Shannon N. Mahar (85-1411), 801 F.2d 1477 (6th Cir. 1986)
  …o asserts the Fifth Amendment privilege. See United States v. Pennell, 737 F. 2d 521, 527 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1158, 105 S.Ct. 906, 83 L.Ed.2d 921 (1985); United States v. Gullett, 713 F. 2d 1203, 1209 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1069, 104 S.Ct. 973, 79 L.Ed.2d 211 (1984); United States v. Lenz, 616 F. 2d 960, 962 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 929, 100 S.Ct. 3028, 65 L.Ed.2d 1124 (1980). We respectfully decline to overrule or modify these decisions. . On appeal, defendant S…