POINTON ET AL.

v.

FIDELITY NATIONAL BANK, N. A.

Citator

Cited By

• Immigr. & Naturalization Serv. v. Pangilinan, 486 U.S. 875 (U.S. 1988)
  …cided the Pangilinan-Litonjua consolidated cases by relying on the collateral-estoppel theory of its Mendoza decision, which had not yet been reversed by this Court. We vacated that judgment in light of our ruling [*882] in Mendoza. INS v. Litonjua, 465 U. S. 1001 (1984), vacating and remanding Barretto v. United States, 694 F. 2d 603 (CA9 1982). On remand, the Ninth Circuit held that the revocation of Vice Consul Ennis’ naturalization authority violated what it characterized as the mandatory language of §§…
• Re Naturalization of Antolin Punsalan Pangilinan v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 796 F.2d 1091 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …l claim. Barretto v. United States, 694 F. 2d 603 (9th Cir.1982). After the Supreme Court reversed Mendoza on the collateral estoppel ground, it vacated and remanded the Litonjua and Pangilinan cases to us for further consideration. INS v. Litonjua, 465 U.S. 1001, 104 S.Ct. 990, 79 L.Ed.2d 224 (1984). . All questions presented by these appeals are pure questions of law reviewable de novo. United States v. McConney, 728 F. 2d 1195, 1200 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 101, 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (19…
• Agcaoili v. Gustafson, 844 F.2d 620 (9th Cir. 1988)
  …eligible for naturalization after the cut-off date. The government has adopted a policy of granting all petitions of Category I veterans, Barretto v. United States, 694 F. 2d 603, 608 n. 11 (9th Cir.1982), vacated on other grounds, INS v. Litonjua, 465 U.S. 1001, 104 S.Ct. 990, 79 L.Ed.2d 224 (1984), and of granting the petitions of Category II veterans that were filed before the government’s withdrawal of its appeal in 68 Filipinos in November 1977. Id. at 608. When this appeal was filed, the issue of wh…