JARRETT

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• Ohio v. Johnson, 467 U.S. 493 (U.S. 1984)
  …his guilty pleas, further prosecution on the more serious offenses was barred by the double jeopardy prohibitions of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. This judgmént was affirmed on appeal through the Ohio state courts, and we granted certiorari. 465 U. S. 1004 (1984). We now reverse the judgment of the Supreme Court of Ohio and hold that prosecuting respondent on the two more serious charges would not constitute the type of “multiple prosecution” prohibited by the Double Jeopardy Clause. [*495] Thomas Hi…
• United States v. Morton, 467 U.S. 822 (U.S. 1984)
  …it creates a substantial risk of imposing significant liabilities upon the United States as a result of garnishment proceedings, and because the decision below created a conflict in the Circuits,3 we granted the Government’s petition for certiorari, 465 U. S. 1004 (1984). b-i Ten years ago Congress decided that compensation payable to federal employees, including members of the Armed Services, should be subject to legal process to enforce employees’ obligations to provide child support or make alimony payme…
• United States v. Whaley, 830 F.2d 1469 (7th Cir. 1987)
  …ed that “vindictive prosecution has as its basis an increase in charges or a new prosecution allegedly brought in retaliation for the exercise of constitutional rights.” United States v. Jarrett, 705 F. 2d 198, 204 n. 8 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1004, 104 S.Ct. 995, 79 L.Ed.2d 228 (1984). No vindictiveness was found in a prosecutor’s decision that was “based upon the normal factors ordinarily considered in determining what course to pursue, rather than upon genuine animus against the defendant…