BALDWIN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (35 total)

• United States v. Mealy, 851 F.2d 890 (7th Cir. 1988)
  …into evidence. Nevertheless, we do not believe that the plea agreements [*900] in this case disproportionately emphasized or repeated the promise of truthful testimony. See United States v. Henderson, 717 F. 2d 135, 138 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1009, 104 S.Ct. 1006, 79 L.Ed.2d 238 (1984); Halbert, 640 F. 2d at 1005. In any case, the judge’s instruction9 to the jury that they should use caution in evaluating the government witnesses’ testimony was sufficient to dispel any harmful effects of the…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Harich v. Louie L. Wainwright, 813 F.2d 1082 (11th Cir. 1987)
  …nse was meritorious under the facts as known by counsel was a matter of conjecture; “without impugning counsel’s integrity or professionalism we must conclude that in the absence of a record the truth of this issue is undeterminable”), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1009, 104 S.Ct. 1006, 79 L.Ed.2d 237 (1984). See also Code v. Montgomery, 725 F. 2d at 1321 (where lower courts have not found facts necessary to a determination of ineffective assistance claim, court must remand for an evidentiary hearing). Second, t…
• United States v. Amel F. Lueth, 807 F.2d 719 (8th Cir. 1986)
  …ted before the jury retired to consider its verdict. We have noted the relevance of cautionary and limiting instructions in assessing the possible prejudice from misjoinder. United States v. Givens, 712 F. 2d 1298, 1301 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1009, 104 S.Ct. 1005, 79 L.Ed.2d 237 (1984). More importantly, however, evidence of Lueth’s expenditures would have been admissible under Count I of the indictment, charging Lueth with engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise, regardless of whether t…