SCHAAB

v.

SCHAAB ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• U.S. Marine Corp. & Bayliner Marine Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 944 F.2d 1305 (7th Cir. 1991)
  …69), “the remedy chosen must ‘achieve the remedial objectives which the Act sets forth,”’ Yorke v. NLRB, 709 F. 2d 1138, 1144-45 (7th Cir.1983) (quoting Republic Steel Corp. v. NLRB, 311 U.S. 7, 12, 61 S.Ct. 77, 79, 85 L.Ed. 6 (1940)), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1023, 104 S.Ct. 1276, 79 L.Ed.2d 680 (1984); Emsing’s Supermarket, 872 F. 2d at 1291 (quoting Yorke). Because the Board’s order remedies a violation of the Act, we cannot accept the company's claim that the Board’s order is punitive. In this case, the…
• Griffith v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 842 F.2d 487 (D.C. Cir. 1988)
  …ent to leave without pay, Schwartz v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 578 F. 2d 417, 420-21 (D.C.Cir.1978), and one involving a policeman’s claim to a particular assignment, Hughes v. Whitmer, 714 F. 2d 1407, 1414 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1023, 104 S.Ct. 1275, 79 L.Ed.2d 680 (1984). Pay increase as promotion. A pay increase is of course a variety of promotion. As Congress recognized in the Federal Salary Reform Act of 1962, the superior’s flexibility in awarding such advancement is a use…
• In re Tucson Yellow CAB Co., Inc. v. Ingrum, 789 F.2d 701 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …tering the estate. Against this conclusion, several equitable arguments are mobilized. The workers won two weeks back pay from the NLRB; that too has priority as an administrative expense. Yorke v. NLRB, 709 F. 2d 1138 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1023, 104 S.Ct. 1276, 79 L.Ed.2d 680 (1984). Mary Ingrum’s large claim is going to be largely disappointed by the wage priorities. And her large claim has more significance to her than any of the severance pay claims will have to their individual benefic…