FOREMAN

v.

RICKETTS, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Citator

Cited By

• Leodis Dortch v. O'Leary, 863 F.2d 1337 (7th Cir. 1988)
  …in this case as opposed to the constitutional analysis employed to reach that result. We refuse to do so because “[i]t is precisely this type of consideration Stone v. Powell precludes.” Sanders v. Israel, 717 F. 2d 422 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1033, 104 S.Ct. 1302, 79 L.Ed.2d 701 (1984) (citations omitted). Indeed, in United States ex rel. Maxey v. Morris, 591 F. 2d 386, 389 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 912, 99 S.Ct. 2828, 61 L.Ed.2d 278 (1979), this court stated: “Stone thus establishe…
• Stawicki v. Thomas Israel & the Attorney Gen. of the State of Wis., 778 F.2d 380 (7th Cir. 1985)
  …consin courts, however, he cannot be granted federal habeas corpus relief on this basis. Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465, 494, 96 S.Ct. 3037, 3052, 49 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1976); see also Sanders v. Israel, 717 F. 2d 422, 423-24 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1033, 104 S.Ct. 1302, 79 L.Ed.2d 701 (1984).…
• United States v. Sullivan, 803 F.2d 87 (3d Cir. 1986)
  …properly admitted, reference to it cannot be error, because the prosecution may “ask the jury to draw permissible inferences from anything that appears in the record.” Oliver v. Zimmerman, 720 F. 2d 766, 770 (3d Cir.1983) (per curiam), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1033, 104 S.Ct. 1302, 79 L.Ed.2d 701 (1984). E. The Jury Instructions on Extortion In its instructions to the jury, the district court stated that extortion may be established by the receipt of money under color of office. In doing so, it rejected Sull…