GONZALES

v.

TEXAS

Citator

Cited By

• Miller v. United States Dep't OF State, 779 F.2d 1378 (8th Cir. 1985)
  …to the general duty to disclose imposed by FOIA. Since the exemption runs counter to the dominant objective of the Act, the exemption is to be narrowly construed. Davis v. Central Intelligence Agency, 711 F. 2d 858, 861 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1035, 104 S.Ct. 1307, 79 L.Ed.2d 705 (1984). When an agency seeks to withhold release of government documents under this exemption, the court is required to determine de novo the propriety of the agency’s decision. See 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B). But si…
• Jewell Scott v. State OF La. & Bruce Lynn, 934 F.2d 631 (5th Cir. 1991)
  …run concurrently with the life sentence, have no adverse collateral consequences for Scott because of his life sentence without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence. Williams v. Maggio, 714 F. 2d 554 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1035, 104 S.Ct. 1306, 79 L.Ed.2d 704 (1984). We therefore affirm the district court’s dismissal of habeas corpus relief on the attempted murder counts under the concurrent sentence doctrine. It is possible, however, that one day the error in the jury in…
• In re Dep't OF Just. v. United States Dep't OF Just., 999 F.2d 1302 (8th Cir. 1993)
  …index thus functions to restore the adversary process to some extent, and to permit more effective judicial review of the agency’s decision.” Wiener v. FBI, 943 F. 2d at 977-78; see also Davis v. CIA, 711 F. 2d 858, 861 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1035, 104 S.Ct. 1307, 79 L.Ed.2d 705 (1984). ROBBINS DECISION As has already been discussed, Exemption 7(A) is the law enforcement exemption and provides that disclosure is not required of “matters that are ... investigatory records or information comp…