GARRETT

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (55 total)

• Dole Duncan v. State, 525 So. 2d 938 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)
  …ent judge, he was able to introduce what he believed to be a key piece of evidence — the gun — at the second trial. We contrast this fact with those circumstances alluded to in United States v. Gonzalez, 719 F. 2d 1516 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1037, 104 S.Ct. 1312, 79 L.Ed.2d 710 (1984), and in United States v. Zielie, 734 F. 2d 1447 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1189, 105 S.Ct. 957, 83 L.Ed.2d 964 (1985), and 469 U.S. 1216, 105 S.Ct. 1192, 84 L.Ed.2d 338 (1985). In both cases, the…
• Staples v. United States, 511 U.S. 600 (U.S. 1994)
  …that the weapon was a “firearm”). Not until 1989 did a Court of Appeals adopt the view of the majority today. See United States v. Williams, 872 F. 2d 773 (CA6). See, e. g., United States v. Gonzalez, 719 F. 2d 1516,1522 (CA11 1983), cert, denied, 465 U. S. 1037 (1984); Morgan v. United States, 564 F. 2d 803, 805-806 (CA8 1977); United States v. Cowper, 503 F. 2d 130,132-133 (CA6 1974), cert. denied, 420 U. S. 930 (1975); United States v. DeBartolo, 482 F. 2d 312, 316 (CA1 1973); United States v. Vasquez, 4…
• United States v. Vega, 860 F.2d 779 (7th Cir. 1988)
  …n inferences from the basic facts in evidence in order to accept its hypothesis regarding the events in dispute.” United States v. Allen, 797 F. 2d 1395, 1399 (7th Cir.1986) (quoting United States v. Moya, 721 F. 2d 606 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1037, 104 S.Ct. 1312, 79 L.Ed.2d 709 (1984)). Review of a verdict based upon circumstantial evidence also requires special deference to a jury’s common sense. As we stated in Nesbitt, 852 F. 2d at 1511: “Juries are allowed to draw upon their own experi…