ADAMS ET AL.

v.

PROCTOR & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412 (U.S. 1985)
  …judge’s determination that a juror may be excused for cause under Witherspoon, see Darden v. Wainwright, 725 F. 2d 1526, 1528-1530 (CA11 1984); O’Bryan v. Estelle, 714 F. 2d 365 [*418] (CA5 1983), cert. denied, 465 U. S. 1013 (1984); Texas v. Mead, 465 U. S. 1041, 1043 (1984) (Rehnquist, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari), and because of what seemed to us as more general confusion surrounding the application of Witherspoon, we granted certiorari. 466 U. S. 957. We reverse. II Witherspoon is best u…
• Abdul Muhammad Samaad v. City OF Dallas, 940 F.2d 925 (5th Cir. 1991)
  …ifferently than other similarly situated"); United States v. Cronn, 717 F. 2d 164, 169 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1217, 104 S.Ct. 3586, 82 L.Ed.2d 884 (1984); United States v. Harrelson, 713 F. 2d 1114, 1117 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1041, 104 S.Ct. 1318, 79 L.Ed.2d 714 (1984). Cf. LaBounty v. Adler, 933 F. 2d 121, 123 (2d Cir.1991) (black inmate stated cause of action where he alleged that similarly situated white inmates were given preferred work assignments). . It is well settled…
• Journal Publ'g Co. v. The Honorable E.L. Mechem, 801 F.2d 1233 (10th Cir. 1986)
  …rial than it is during trial, see Sherman, 581 F. 2d at 1361, the courts have properly exercised their right to protect jurors from unwanted post-trial harassment. See United States v. Harrelson, 713 F. 2d 1114, 1117-18 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1041, 104 S.Ct. 1318, 79 L.Ed.2d 714 (1984). For example, courts have routinely shielded jurors from post-trial “fishing expeditions” carried out by losing attorneys interested in casting doubt on the jury’s verdict. United States v. Hall, 424 F.Supp.…