RICHARDSON
v.
UNITED STATES
RICHARDSON
UNITED STATES
465 U.S. 1064
Supreme Court of the United States (1984)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sch. Dist. of the City of Grand Rapids v. Ball, 473 U.S. 373 (U.S. 1985)…of the District Court to the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. A divided panel of the Court of Appeals affirmed. Americans United for Separation of Church and State v. School Dist. of Grand Rapids, 718 F. 2d 1389 (1983). We granted certiorari, 465 U. S. 1064 (1984), and now affirm. * * * * * A The First Amendment’s guarantee that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,” as our cases demonstrate, is more than a pledge that no single religion will be designated as a state r…
-
Heckler v. Turner, 470 U.S. 184 (U.S. 1985)…issue have concluded that Congress intended the flat work-expense disregard of § 402(a)(8) to encompass mandatory payroll with-holdings, and that “income” for purposes of § 402(a)(7) was gross income.2 We granted certiorari to resolve the conflict. 465 U. S. 1064 (1984). On July 19, 1984, after the writ had issued but before this Court heard oral argument, the Deficit Reduction Act of 1984, Pub. L. 98-369, 98 Stat. 494, became law. This new legislation includes a provision, § 2625(a), [*189] 98 Stat. 1135, t…
-
Heckler v. Turner, 468 U.S. 1305 (U.S. 1984)…conflict with decisions of the Third and Fourth Circuits, causing a significant disparity in the treatment of AFDC beneficiaries based solely on residence. This Court granted the Secretary’s petition for a writ of certiorari to resolve the conflict. 465 U. S. 1064 (1984). Subsequently, on July 18, 1984, the President signed into law the Deficit Reduction Act of 1984, Pub. L. 98-369, 98 Stat. 494. Section 2625(a) of that Act, entitled “Clarification of Earned Income Provision,” amends § 402(a)(8) of the AFDC…