ALBRIGHT

v.

BORDENKIRCHER, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By (32 total)

• Myers v. Sullivan, 916 F.2d 659 (11th Cir. 1990)
  …v. Bowen, 836 F. 2d 1249, 1252 (9th Cir.1988); Cook v. Heckler, 751 F. 2d 240, 241 (8th Cir.1984); Brown v. Secretary of Health & Human Services, 747 F. 2d 878, 880-81 (3d Cir.1984); McGill v. Schweiker, 712 F. 2d 28, 32 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1068, 104 S.Ct. 1420, 79 L.Ed.2d 745 (1984); Miller v. Schweiker, 560 F.Supp. 838 (M.D.Ala.1983); see Sullivan v. Hudson, 490 U.S. at -, 109 S.Ct. at 2255 (“We think it clear that ... a Social Security claimant would not, as a general matter, be a prevai…
• Nichols v. United States, 511 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1994)
  …esents the Court’s holding. See, e. g., United States v. Castro-Vega, 945 F. 2d 496, 499-500 (CA2 1991); United States v. Eckford, 910 F. 2d 216, 219, n. 8 (CA5 1990); Schindler v. Clerk of Circuit Court, 715 F. 2d 341, 345 (CA7 1983), cert. denied, 465 U. S. 1068 (1984). Another Court of Appeals has concluded that the holding in Baldasar is Justice Blackmun’s rationale, Santillanes v. United States Parole Comm’n, 754 F. 2d 887, 889 (CA10 1985); yet another has concluded that the “consensus” of the Baldasar…
• United States v. Moreno L. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678 (7th Cir. 1985)
  …rnment’s control because the government has refused to immunize him, and it can be presumed that he would refuse to testify on grounds of self-incrimination. See, e.g., United States v. Flomenhoft, 714 F. 2d 708, 713-14 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1068, 104 S.Ct. 1420, 79 L.Ed.2d 745 (1984). But defendants reason that because Kennedy’s immunity grant was conditioned upon his giving truthful testimony, had Kennedy testified for the defense, and contrary to his prior grand jury testimony, he would…