CATANZARO

v.

HART ELECTRONICS CORP.

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• Pa. Bureau of Corr. v. United States Marshals Serv., 474 U.S. 34 (U.S. 1985)
  …agreement between the Attorney General and The Chief Justice regarding court security and the allocation of marshals). See Ford v. Allen, 728 F. 2d 1369 (CA11 1984) (per curiam); Wiggins v. County of Alameda, 717 F. 2d 466 (CA9 1983), cert. denied, 465 U. S. 1070 (1984); Ford v. Carballo, 577 F. 2d 404 (CA7 1978); Ballard v. Spradley, 557 F. 2d 476 (CA5 1977). See Wiggins v. County of Alameda, 717 F. 2d, at 469 (“We decry the inability of state and federal officials to resolve such matters fairly and equita…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Gennaro J. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169 (1st Cir. 1990)
  …hed that a motion for change of venue “is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be reversed in the absence of an abuse of discretion.” Id.; see also United States v. Kelly, 722 F. 2d 873, 881 (1st Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1070, 104 S.Ct. 1425, 79 L.Ed.2d 749 (1984). In determining whether sufficient prejudice existed to require a change of venue, we must conduct two inquiries: 1) whether jury prejudice should be presumed given the facts before us; or 2) if prejudice shou…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Bucci, 839 F.2d 825 (1st Cir. 1988)
  …establish a violation by showing that a defendant induced payment either through the use of actual or threatened force, violence, or fear, or under color of official right. See United States v. Kelly, 722 F. 2d 873, 875 (1st Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1070, 104 S.Ct. 1425, 79 L.Ed.2d 749 (1984). Moreover, we have clarified that “fear” can mean the “fear of economic loss,” United States v. Hatha [*828] way, 534 F. 2d 386, 394 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819, 97 S.Ct. 64, 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976), in…