ROBINETT

v.

SCHWERMAN TRUCKING CO., INC.

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• United States v. Buffington, 815 F.2d 1292 (9th Cir. 1987)
  …has been no showing that the government flagrantly manipulated, overreached, or deceived the grand jury such that dismissal of the indictment is warranted. United States v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 719 F. 2d 1386, 1391-92 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1079, 104 S.Ct. 1441, 79 L.Ed.2d 762 (1984). Cook presents no evidence that knowing perjury related to a material matter was presented to the grand jury. United States v. Kennedy, 564 F. 2d 1329, 1338 (9th Cir.1977), cert, denied, 435 U.S. 944, 98 S.Ct.…
• United States v. Page, 808 F.2d 723 (10th Cir. 1987)
  …ere is no such duty. See, e.g., United States v. Adamo, 742 F. 2d 927, 937-38 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1193, 105 S.Ct. 971, 83 L.Ed.2d 975 (1985); United States v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 719 F. 2d 1386, 1394 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1079, 104 S.Ct. 1441, 79 L.Ed.2d 762 (1984); see also United States v. Civella, 666 F. 2d 1122, 1127 (8th Cir.1981) (prosecutor need not disclose facts that constitute a defense). These courts have reasoned that, because a grand jury is asked to determin…
• United States v. Darrel Paterson Simpson, 813 F.2d 1462 (9th Cir. 1987)
  …visory power to dismiss the indictment, then abuse of discretion would indeed be the applicable standard of review. See United States v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., 719 F. 2d 1386, 1395 n. 2 (9th Cir.1983) (Norris, J., dissenting in part), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1079, 104 S.Ct. 1441, 79 L.Ed.2d 762 (1984); cf. In re Kiefaber, 774 F. 2d 969, 974 (9th Cir.1985) (exercise of supervisory power to quash grand jury subpoena reviewed for abuse of discretion). However, Judge Hatter did not invoke the court's supervisory…