BIRCH

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Folak, 865 F.2d 110 (7th Cir. 1988)
  …the two are not interchangeable. Relief in the nature of a writ of coram nobis is only available to the extent that it has not been replaced by other statutory remedies, United States v. Darnell, 716 F. 2d 479, 481 n. 4 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1083, 104 S.Ct. 1454, 79 L.Ed.2d 771 (1984), and is generally invoked only by those defendants who cannot fulfill § 2255’s custody requirement. See, e.g., Id.; Keane, 852 F. 2d 199, 202-03. Because he remains in custody, Folak’s recourse is via § 2255, n…
• Kontos v. United States Dep't OF Labor, 826 F.2d 573 (7th Cir. 1987)
  …ign immunity, that the time limits for filing employment discrimination claims against the federal government create a prerequisite to federal court jurisdiction. See also Scott v. St. Paul Postal Service, 720 F. 2d 524 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1083, 104 S.Ct. 1453, 79 L.Ed.2d 770 (1984); Rice v. Hamilton Air Force Base Commissary, 720 F. 2d 1082 (9th Cir.1983); Stuckett v. United States Postal Service, 469 U.S. 898, 105 S.Ct. 274, 83 L.Ed.2d 210 (1984) (White, J., and Rehnquist, J., dissenting…
• Ross v. U.S. Postal Serv., 814 F.2d 616 (11th Cir. 1987)
  …67 (4th Cir.1985); Martinez v. Orr, 738 F. 2d 1107 (10th Cir.1984); Saltz v. Lehman, 672 F. 2d 207 (D.C.Cir.1982). The position of some circuits is not clear. See, e.g., Scott v. St. Paul Postal Service, 720 F. 2d 524 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1083, 104 S.Ct. 1453, 79 L.Ed.2d 770 (1984) (affirming dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, but, referring to the requirement as a statute of limitations and stating that equitable tolling was not appropriate on the facts given). The Seve…