DAILEY ET AL.

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Meade v. Grubbs, 841 F.2d 1512 (10th Cir. 1988)
  …t Director of the Colo [*1533] rado Civil Rights Division is entitled to absolute immunity for closing file on an employment discrimination charge because “[t]he adjudicatory and prosecutorial nature of her responsibilities is clear”), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1103, 104 S.Ct. 1601, 80 L.Ed.2d 131 (1984). We hold that defendants Turpén and Leavitt are entitled to absolute immunity with respect to their decisions not to initiate criminal or civil proceedings here. B. Qualified Immunity We now turn to the iss…
• United States v. Frank, 864 F.2d 992 (3d Cir. 1988)
  …o the release date, short of the statutory term. United States v. Addonizio, 442 U.S. 178, 99 S.Ct. 2235, 60 L.Ed.2d 805 (1979). Likewise, this court in Geraghty v. United States Parole Commission, 719 F. 2d 1199, 1208 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1103, 104 S.Ct. 1602, 80 L.Ed.2d 133 (1984), squarely held that the legislation creating the federal parole board was not an impermissible delegation of an inherently judicial function. Thus, we hold that Congress may lawfully curtail judicial discretio…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Lindell, 881 F.2d 1313 (5th Cir. 1989)
  …jury was not coerced: 1) after resuming deliberations on Monday, there were no more “deadlock” notes prior to the partial verdict; 2) the verdict was a discriminating one, see United States v. Foster, 711 F. 2d 871, 884 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1103, 104 S.Ct. 1602, 80 L.Ed.2d 132 (1984);14 3) the trial judge did not inquire [*1322] into the numerical division of the jury, Brasfield v. United States, 272 U.S. 448, 449-50, 47 S.Ct. 185, 136, 71 L.Ed. 345 (1926); 4) no deadline was set for the ju…