WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP.

v.

VAUGHN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• O'Connor v. Peru State Coll., 781 F.2d 632 (8th Cir. 1986)
  …th Cir.1982); cf. Vaughn v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 702 F. 2d 137 (8th Cir.1983) (upholding finding of pretext despite district court’s express statement that plaintiff did have some work deficiencies), cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 466 U.S. 521, 104 S.Ct. 2163, 80 L.Ed.2d 531 (1984). Similarly, an inference of pretext can be drawn from an employer’s general policies and attitudes toward women, see McDonnell Douglas, 411 U.S. at 804-05, 93 S.Ct. at 1825; Easley v. Empire Inc., 757 F. 2d 92…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Mintzes v. Buchanon, 471 U.S. 154 (U.S. 1985)
  …f Appeals even has jurisdiction to vacate or otherwise modify its opinion, given that our writ of certiorari is still lodged in that court; at the very least, the Court should vacate its writ of certiorari. Cf. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Vaughn, 466 U. S. 521 (1984); Colorado v. Nunez, 465 U. S. 324 (1984); Gillette Co. v. Miner, 459 U. S. 86 (1982). The Court’s disposition leaves the status of the Court of Appeals’ judgment and opinion in limbo. I believe we have an institutional obligation to avoid suc…
• Stepney v. Lopes, 760 F.2d 40 (2d Cir. 1985)
  …t statement. The Connecticut Supreme Court denied Stepney’s motion for reargument. The [*43] United States Supreme Court denied his petition for certiorari, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1455, 79 L.Ed.2d 772 (1984), and his petition for rehearing, — U.S. -,. 104 S.Ct. 2163, 80 L.Ed.2d 547 (1984). B. The Present Habeas Petition Stepney then filed the present petition for habeas corpus in the district court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1982). He argued principally that testimony as to his exercise of his Sixth Amendm…