DUARTE ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (37 total)

• State v. Singletary, 549 So. 2d 996 (Fla. 1989)
  …rsible error by permitting voir dire to be conducted before a magistrate. The First Circuit in United States v. Rivera-Sola, 713 F. 2d 866 (1st Cir.1983), and the Second Circuit in United States v. DeFiore, 720 F. 2d 757 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 906, 104 S.Ct. 1684, 80 L.Ed.2d 158 (1984), each affirmed convictions because the defendant failed to object to the absence of the judge. In Haith v. United States, 342 F. 2d 158 (3d Cir.1965), not only was the judge absent during jury selection but the…
• Gomez v. United States, 490 U.S. 858 (U.S. 1989)
  …ction on procedural grounds. United States v. Rivera-Sola, 713 F. 2d 866 (CA1 1983) (defendant failed to object, no plain error); United States v. DeFiore, 720 F. 2d 757 (CA2 1983) (failure to object), cert. denied sub nom. Coppola v. United States, 466 U. S. 906 (1984). Garcia, 848 F. 2d, at 1329 (quoting In re Establishment Inspection of Gilbert & Bennett Manufacturing Co., 589 F. 2d 1335, 1340-1341 (CA7) (in sustaining inspection warrant issued by Magistrate, states that the “ ‘only limitations on sectio…
• Peretz v. United States, 501 U.S. 923 (U.S. 1991)
  …illiams, 892 F. 2d 305, 308-309 (1989). See, e. g., United States v. Ford, 824 F. 2d 1430 (CA5 1987) (en banc), cert. denied, 484 U. S. 1034 (1988); United States v. DeFiore, 720 F. 2d 757 (CA2 1983), cert. denied sub nom. Coppola v. United States, 466 U. S. 906 (1984); United States v. Rivera-Sola, 713 F. 2d 866 (CA1 1983); Haith v. United States, 342 F. 2d 158 (CA3 1965). “It can hardly be denied that the system created by the Federal Magistrates Act has exceeded the highest expectations of the legislato…

  ← 1 / 2 →