MCFALL

v.

PARKE, WARDEN, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Shore v. Fed. Express Corp., 777 F.2d 1155 (6th Cir. 1985)
  …dine, and the defendant’s production of a legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for its actions correctly shifted the burden back to Shore to prove pretext. Cf. Brooks v. Ashtabula County Welfare Dep’t, 717 F. 2d 263, 267 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 907, 104 S.Ct. 1687, 80 L.Ed.2d 160. We thus reject the argument of Federal Express and affirm the district court’s conclusion that intentional discrimination exists in this case. Federal Express’ second argument is based on the plaintiff’s duty to mit…
• United States v. Chase, 838 F.2d 743 (5th Cir. 1988)
  …of those conversations but merely to assist you in determining what is on the tape, and it is the tape from which you should determine the content of those conversations. See United States v. Larson, 722 F. 2d 139, 144 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 907, 104 S.Ct. 1688, 80 L.Ed.2d 161 (1984). . Omar's contention that coconspirator hearsay evidence may not be considered in weighing the sufficiency of the evidence is, of course, merit-less. See United States v. Pozos, 697 F. 2d 1238, 1242 (5th Cir.1…
• United States v. Yasmin Allibhai and Sultan Allibhai, 939 F.2d 244 (5th Cir. 1991)
  …er evidence of Sultan’s prior money laundering activities in Africa. In support of the district court’s decision to refuse the requested instruction, the government cites United States v. Larson, 722 F. 2d 139, 143 n. 8 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 907, 104 S.Ct. 1688, 80 L.Ed.2d 161 (1984), a case holding that a jury may properly consider evidence of pre-indictment activities when the defendant asserts the entrapment defense. Although Larson involved conduct occurring in the United States, we fin…