PAUL

v.

HALEY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• Lewy v. S. Pac. Transp. Co., 799 F.2d 1281 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …procedures, only when their claims are “premised on a specific federal statutory section,” Jackson, 717 F. 2d at 1050 (emphasis added), accord Landfried v. Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis, 721 F. 2d 254, 256 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 928, 104 S.Ct. 1712, 80 L.Ed.2d 185 (1984), and are designed to vindicate “substantial rights intended by Congress to be judicially enforced.” Gonzalez, 773 F. 2d at 643 (emphasis added); accord Railway Labor Executives Association v. Atchison, Topeka &…
• Am. Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO v. United States Postal Serv., 823 F.2d 466 (11th Cir. 1987)
  …under collective bargaining agreements, subject to the vagaries of the laws of the several states.12 For example, in International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers v. Ingram Manufacturing Co., 715 F. 2d 886 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied 466 U.S. 928, 104 S.Ct. 1711, 80 L.Ed.2d 184 (1984) the Fifth Circuit’s “borrowing” analysis, coupled with the fact that the Texas arbitration statute expressly excluded collective bargaining agreements,13 led the court to hold that a suit to confirm an arbitrat…
• Associated Brick Mason Contractors OF Greater NEW York, Inc. v. Harrington, 820 F.2d 31 (2d Cir. 1987)
  …of limitations to actions to enforce arbitration awards. See Derwin v. General Dynamics Corp., 719 F. 2d 484 (1st Cir.1983); International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers v. Ingram Mfg. Co., 715 F. 2d 886 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 928, 104 S.Ct. 1711, 80 L.Ed.2d 184 (1984). We do not agree. A dispute between a union and an employer remains completely unsettled between the time a grievance arises and the time a petition to compel arbitration is filed. By contrast, there is littl…