TARKOWSKI

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Buffington, 815 F.2d 1292 (9th Cir. 1987)
  …t is not comparable to this case. Other cases that have permitted the inference of an intent to rob a bank have involved testimony by informants or co-conspirators. E.g., United States v. Schramm, 715 F. 2d 1253, 1254 (7th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 930, 104 S.Ct. 1717, 80 L.Ed.2d 189 (1984) (jury can infer intent from defendant’s repeated statements to an informant about his plans to rob a bank); United States v. Snell, 627 F. 2d 186, 188 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 957, 101 S.Ct. 1416,…
• United States v. Fleet Wallace Maull, 806 F.2d 1340 (8th Cir. 1986)
  …onsistent with our prior decisions in United States v. Samuelson, 697 F. 2d 255, 259-60 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1038, 104 S.Ct. 1314, 79 L.Ed.2d 711 (1984), and United States v. Kirk, 723 F. 2d 1379, 1381 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 930, 104 S.Ct. 1717, 80 L.Ed.2d 189 (1984), which were decided before Garrett and Ball, wherein we vacated the conspiracy conviction after the defendants received concurrent sentences for the conspiracy and CCE offenses. The case is remanded to the dis…
• United States v. Holm, 836 F.2d 1119 (8th Cir. 1988)
  …ewing court to decline to pass on the validity of one count of an indictment when the sentence imposed is concurrent with the sentence for a valid conviction on another count. United States v. Kirk, 723 F. 2d 1379, 1381 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 930, 104 S.Ct. 1717, 80 L.Ed.2d 189 (1984). We recognize that we may in our discretion invoke this rule, but we believe that it is not desirable to do so in this case, which involves a direct appeal and in which Holm was exposed to a substantial risk of…