UNITED STATES

v.

POWELL

Citator

Cited By

• Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412 (U.S. 1985)
  …d, 465 U. S. 1013 (1984); Texas v. Mead, 465 U. S. 1041, 1043 (1984) (Rehnquist, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari), and because of what seemed to us as more general confusion surrounding the application of Witherspoon, we granted certiorari. 466 U. S. 957. We reverse. II Witherspoon is best understood in the context of its facts. The case involved the capital sentencing procedures for the State of Illinois. Under the Illinois death sentencing statute, the jury was asked to decide only whether deat…
• In re McDONALD, 489 U.S. 180 (U.S. 1989)
  …file in forma pauperis requests for relief other than an extraordinary writ, if he qualifies under this Court’s Rule 46 and does not similarly abuse that privilege. It is so ordered. See McDonald v. Alabama, 479 U. S. 1061 (1987); In re McDonald, 466 U. S. 957 (1984); McDonald v. Tennessee, 432 U. S. 901 (1977); McDonald v. Purity Dairies Employees Federal Credit Union, 431 U. S. 961 (1977). See McDonald v. Tobey, 488 U. S. 971 (1988); McDonald v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County,…
• Shea v. Louisiana, 470 U.S. 51 (U.S. 1985)
  …ve effect. It stated that that decision was a “clear break with the past,” was a new ruling, and was not retroactive. 421 So. 2d, at 210. Because of the importance of the issue and because of conflicting decisions elsewhere,2 we granted certiorari. 466 U. S. 957 (1984). II Edwards, the case at the center of the present controversy, involved facts startlingly similar to those of the present case. Police officers informed Edwards of his Miranda rights and questioned him until he said he wanted an attorney.…